Strategic Planning
THE IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC
PLANNING - During Difficult Times
An increasing number of businesses expect sales, profits,
employment and capital investment to weaken in the June 2009
quarter, according to the latest Dun & Bradstreet (D&B)
Business Expectations Survey
Findings show 53% of firms anticipate declining sales with 60%
having similar profit expectations. The same downward trend is
forecast for employment and capital investment, while 24% of
businesses expect staff cut backs with 10% anticipating a need to
decrease capital investment.
Despite these doom and gloom figures, fresh research reveals
that relatively few directors and business managers truly
understand or, more importantly, practice long-term strategic
planning. Consequently, they also lack the tactical agility so
often necessary for an organisation to flourish and survive in
today's fickle markets.
What many business leaders think of as strategic planning is
often little more than forecasting and budgeting. Alas, anyone can
jot down figures which, all too often, have no bearing on a
company's real problems and opportunities.
Simply playing around with company finances tends merely to
propel the current business model unchanged into the future thereby
creating a form of corporate "tunnel vision". This can sound the
death knell in today's swiftly changing, sometimes 'panicky',
markets.
Of far greater importance is an ability to swiftly revise
tactics to meet changing requirements of constantly moving, oft
times shrinking, consumer demand. Businesses that ignore this
challenge do so at their peril.
In a recent US study, 93% of industrial goods manufacturers did
not, by their own admission, produce anything approximating an
integrated, coordinated and internally consistent plan for their
marketing activities.
The study also revealed that companies which were profitable
without an effective planning system invariably operated in buoyant
or high-growth markets. When markets turned sour, however, they
were far less successful than comparable businesses which planned
for the future.
When rationalising to improve efficiency, managers often find
they are too late to do anything about previously overlooked
opportunities. Missed chances most frequently cited are, in
order:
- lost profit situations
- meaningless numbers in long range plans
- unrealistic objectives
- lack of actionable market information
- inter-departmental strife
- management frustration
- proliferation of products and markets
- wasted promotional expenditure
- pricing confusion
- growing vulnerability to environmental change
- loss of control over the business
Recent Australian research clearly demonstrates that
inadequacies in the objective-setting process are usually at the
heart of corporate problems. Since a company's very survival
depends entirely on finding and maintaining profitable markets,
establishing clearly defined targets is the key function for any
successful organisation.
Contrary to this sell-evident fact, businesses often assume that
to be commercially successful, management need only set profit
targets, decentralise the organisation into groups of similar
activities, then make departmental heads accountable for achieving
those profits. Middle management will somehow make everything come
right!
Such 'loose' delegated procedures may be adequate in the good
times. But what about when markets and opportunities are in a
constant state of flux and contraction as they are right now?
Organisations, big and small, are in strife simply because these
decentralised units are invariably geared only toward maximizing
current profit and loss accounts. Let the future take care of
itself.
Compounding the problem is the fact that few businesses
correctly identify what it is that they do better than their
competitors - their Unique Selling Proposition (USP). Or how a
"distinctive competence" must meet the true needs of their
particular target audience.
Financial objectives, while essential measures of company
performance, are of little practical help on their own since they
say nothing about how the outcomes are to be achieved. The same
applies to sales forecasts and budgets - which encompass neither
marketing strategies nor tactics.
Ironically, it is because managers are evaluated and rewarded on
the basis of short-term profitability they find difficulty in
concerning themselves with the long-term corporate future. It is
safer - and usually more rewarding - to simply concentrate an
existing product range aimed at an already established customer
base in order to achieve budget.
Budgets and sales forecasts, while necessary, rarely include the
most important element of all ... precisely what must be done to
achieve them.